The article entitled “We Won’t Solve Nation’s Problems
without First Targeting Immigration” presents a powerful and emotional but
flawed argument on the lax immigration policies of the United States and its
social and economic impact on the United States. It explains that the root of the social evils
in the United States
is the lax immigration policy and that the solution to the problem of health
care, employment, crime and terrorism is to impose a stricter immigration
policy. Yeh stressed that it is not
possible to find solution to the country’s crime, employment, terrorism and
health care problems without first controlling immigration. While Yeh is not against immigration per se
as it was admitted that they can be assets to the United States, Yeh is against
uncontrolled immigration. Yeh advocates
the reduction of the influx of immigrants in the United States as a solution to most
of the United States
social, economic and political problems.
First, Yeh argues that the influx of immigrants creates a
high demand for job which the labor market could not afford to adequately
supply. From a theoretical standpoint,
it may appear to be a strong argument against immigration. If there is a continuous influx of immigrants
and the job market could not supply these demands then unemployment rate
increases. Immigrants and citizens will
be competing for substantially similar job.
Employers shall have the prerogative to reduce the wages for these jobs
because they know that the job applicants will nonetheless accept these
jobs.
However, the assertion is not supported by research. Economists say that in most cases immigrants
help fuel the American economy because of their willingness to perform jobs
that not every citizen is willing to do.
For some people, immigrants actually give more than what they can take
insofar as helping the economy is concerned.
If the employers hire and employ illegal immigrants at a cheaper price
then employers can cut their overhead cost by a significant amount. Lesser overhead expenditures mean more
savings. More savings translate to more
profits. More profits mean for incentive
for businesses and investors to put up their own businesses in the United States. Eventually, the benefit goes back to the job
market because new investors put up their businesses in the United States. (Deborah White p.3)
Second, Yeh appears to present a strong argument that the immigrants are
taking over the jobs that should go to the citizens of the United States. Research shows that immigrants are not
displacing
citizens from their jobs. It does not
lead to lower wages and lower terms and conditions of employment. In fact, the adverse economic impact on a
relatively small number of unskilled workers is even mitigated by the gains the
United States economy receives from the lower prices of goods produced by the
immigrants. Considering that wage is one
of the factors that determine the cost of the goods and services, lower wages
will result to cheaper goods and services.
This gives the public opportunity to purchase lower-priced goods and
services.
 |
The Reliable and Affordable Essay Writing Services
|
Third, Yeh argues that the existing jobs should instead be
given to low-skilled unemployment citizens and non-violent former prison
inmates instead of the immigrants who come to the country. The choice however of whom should the
employers accept as his employee belongs to the employers alone. It does not belong to the government. It does not belong to the Yeh Ling-Ling. It belongs to the employers who should decide
for themselves which job applicants they should accept based on business
decisions. It should be borne in mind
that these immigrants do not have any power over the individuals whom they work
for. Thus, to say that immigrants are
taking jobs that belong to United States citizens is unfair to the immigrants
who work hard to earn their living and who went through the same process as the
citizens in applying their job.
Fourth, it may also appear that Yeh’s example that
California which receives more immigrants than any other state is on the verge
of bankruptcy. It may be true that California has the
highest number of immigrants in the United States but it is unfair to
blame these immigrants for the current financial condition of the State of California. Whether California is on the verge of bankruptcy is
debatable. But to say that the
immigrants are responsible for the financial condition of California is totally absurd since these
immigrants do not have the direct access to the total budget of California. They are not spending it directly. They are also not in-charge of allocating the
budget. Secondly, the statement is not
supported by evidence. On the contrary,
in a 64-page study entitled “The Impact of Immigration on the California
Economy” which was commissioned by the California Economic Strategy Panel, it
was found that California has done better than the national average over the
past 15 years according the standards of wages, job creation and unemployment. The report even stressed that the average
wages in California
have risen faster than those in the nation as a whole since 1990s. (Tom Abate
1) In addition, its job growth has even
exceeded the country since 1994. (Tom Abate 1)
Moreover, UC Berkeley economic David Card said that while it is true
that immigration gives an economy more mouths to feed, immigration makes up for
it since they help in expanding the economy. (Tom Abate 1)
Fifth, Yeh also blames the immigrants for the country’s
budget deficits saying that low-skilled workers who are presumed to have lower
incomes are not likely to pay enough taxes.
Yeh also added that the even if they pay the right taxes it is not even
enough to offset the cost of educating their children and pay for social
services. The argument is also not based
on studies and empirical research. On
the contrary, in 2007 the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) stated in the
context of the overall budget, the net impact of immigration is relatively
small. (James R. Horney 1) It is true that the immigration results in the
increase of federal expenditure in terms of social welfare programs such as
Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, but the immigrants help in the increase of
government revenue in terms of the requirement of the payment of back taxes for
immigrants who will gain legal status, increase in aggregate wages, incentives
for more accurate reporting of income and imposition of fines and penalties.
(James R. Horney 1) It would appear that
the revenues to be derived from immigrants would even reduce the deficit by a
significant amount.
Sixth, Yeh likewise argues that immigrants should be blamed
for the 9/11 attacks and for the $100 billion spent on measures to curb
international terrorism. The 9/11
terrorist attack is a shock for everyone even for the immigrants who have
resided in the country for years and have considered the United States
their home. While it is true that the
persons responsible for the World Trade Center Bombing and the Pentagon bombing
are foreigners, the immigrants per se should not be blamed for terrorism. Instead, the government agencies and
officials which have been allocated a substantial amount of public money to
protect the nation against domestic and international threat should be blamed
for what had happened. Evidence shows
that the terrorists planned the attack for months. Intelligence officials should have known and
found out about the coordinated attacks since these activities do not just
happen without planning, funds and support.
The government should have been able to prevent them. Moreover,
immigrants should not be blamed even for the government allocation since they
were not the ones who made the decision to spend that amount of money to fight
terrorism. They were also not the ones
who influenced the lawmakers and the government officials to make that
decision. Thus, to blame the immigrants
for the government policies is highly absurd.
No rational individual would perhaps disagree with Yeh’s
statement that immigrants are assets to the country and that massive
immigration affects everybody. The issue
is when does immigration become massive? Who determines when immigration
becomes so huge that it affects the country? What are the parameters and
standard? Yeh believes that immigration is already massive. But there are economists who are experts in
the field refuting the said statement.
Based on Yeh’s arguments presented on the issue of
immigration, it is clear that Yeh’s knowledge about the impact of immigration
on the economic and crime is not adequately and sufficiently supported by
studies and empirical research. It would
appear that Yeh’s knowledge and background information about the topic of
immigration are based on hearsay and generalizations of the information received
from advocates against immigration. At
first glance, the arguments may appear to be convincing and persuasive. Yet if the arguments will be closely analyzed
loopholes can be seen and detected which was already done in this
analysis.
Yeh is efficient in appealing to the sympathy of the
millions of unemployed and victims of terrorism. Yet, as already emphasized the
arguments do not hold any water since empirical research refutes the
generalizations which Yeh has presented.
Yeh’s arguments could be improved and made more convincing if it will be
supported by research and studies.
Statements from economists and researchers and other experts on the
topic could have added persuasive effect on the article.
BUY CRITICAL ANALYSIS ESSAY ON "WE WONT SOLVE NATION'S PROBLEMS WITHOUT FIRST TARGETING IMMIGRATION" NOW!
This is a sample Critical Analysis Essay on "We Won’t Solve Nation’s Problems without First Targeting Immigration" by Yeh Ling-Ling from smartessaywriters.com – the leading provider of reliable and affordable essay writing services and research paper writing services in the United States and the United Kingdom
BUY CRITICAL ANALYSIS ESSAY ON "WE WONT SOLVE NATION'S PROBLEMS WITHOUT FIRST TARGETING IMMIGRATION" NOW!
This is a sample Critical Analysis Essay on "We Won’t Solve Nation’s Problems without First Targeting Immigration" by Yeh Ling-Ling from smartessaywriters.com – the leading provider of reliable and affordable essay writing services and research paper writing services in the United States and the United Kingdom
