Live Chat Support

Friday, September 6, 2013

Essay on Poverty and Crime




Essay on Poverty and Crime
  
            Every social problem is related to one another. A particular social problem like those categorized as economic problems can aggravate other problems such as drug abuse, unemployment, dissolution of family structures and crimes. Poverty, an economic problem is seen as a factor that trigger the occurrence of other social problem such as crimes. Poverty has long been considered to be as an important factor in predicting the variation in city crime rates. Communities with greater poverty rates are seen to lack resources for supervision of youth and community organization. Thus these communities are conceived to be more prone to have high crime incidents (Dweyer, 2001). History has proven that crime and poverty have a direct link and that they go hand in hand. We cannot deal with crime without dealing with its root causes like poverty. 

            The correlation between crime and poverty had been explored in a lot of studies. Most of these studies had shown that poverty is indeed greatly linked with the existence of crime. Areas of high socio-economic disadvantage tend to be more crime prone and a large number of crime offenders are coming from these disadvantaged backgrounds (Serr, 2010). The effects of poverty on crime can be explained in numerous reasons and can be further understood through the various reasons of people living in poverty behind committing crime. One of the main reasons for the criminal behavior of poor people is the way of survival. People living in poverty do not have enough and can barely sustain their basic needs and most of the times they commit crimes such as burglary or robbery as ways wherein they can gain money in order to sustain these needs. Since they have fewer options in life, sometimes committing crime is their only option to survive. It also offers a way wherein they can attain other material goods that they cannot obtain in legitimate ways. 

Poverty also means having less resources towards achieving better education which in return can cause the poor youth to have less access towards quality schools, decent jobs and good role models. These out of school youths can have a higher probability of associating with gangs and committing various crimes later on (Ludwig, Duncan & Hirschfield, 1999).
Another reason why people living in poverty commit crime is that it has become a norm in their community or neighborhood to take the law in their own hands. Usually these high poverty stricken areas have less access towards local law enforcements. These people then began to view law enforcement as not being helpful. They believe that as the local authorities failed to help and protect them, they themselves have to take the law in their own hands and commit retaliatory crimes. The responses of the law enforcers are also slower in these kind of neighborhoods so most of the time, one of the poor people’s responses is to commit crime thinking of it as a form of self-help. 

            People living in poverty do not also want to stay in poor  so in order to obtain a higher level of socio-economic status, they opt to committing crime. Crimes such as drug selling can lead to obtaining a fairly large amount of money. People dealing with this kind of crime sees that the money that they can obtain through these illegal acts can help them establish their economic status. Some would use the money that they obtain through drug selling into building a legal business. Once they have established heir legal business, they no longer need to commit crime as they now achieved a higher social position and economic status. 

            The basic assumption through the correlation of crime and poverty lies on the fact that impoverished people oftentimes commit crime because it is a way wherein their basic needs such as food, housing and employment can be met. Crime is seen as the only option of the impoverished people to sustain their life and to fulfil their other aspirations.

Sources:
Dweyer, D. (2001). Angles on Criminal Psychology. United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes

Ludwig, J., Duncan G. & Hirschfield,P. (1999). Urban Poverty and Juvenile Crime:  Evidence From a Randomized Housing-Mobility Experiment. Retrieved on August 31, 2013 from https://www.earlyadolescence.org/files/IOM/LUDWIGediforweb2-7-2000.pdf

Serr, C. (2006). Thinking About Poverty. Australia:The Federation Press    


This is a sample Essay on Poverty and Crime.  We are the leading provider of affordable essay writing services in the United States and the United Kingdom.  If you need help we will write well written essays at very affordable costs starting at $7.50/page.

Argumentative Essay on Adoption





Argumentative Essay on Adoption: Yes, Adoption Should be Encouraged

“Adoption, all in all, has served women, children and society well” – Jean Garton, 1999

Adoption is defined as a process wherein the children are brought together with the adults who are not their biological parents in order to form a family. Adoption has long been practiced in the history usually through informal processes. Today, adoptions in the United States have transformed into a legal process in order to assure the protection of the welfare of the children once their birth parents are gone or are unable to care for them . Adoption has been an important art of United States’ social sphere.  According to the survey conducted by Donaldson Institute in 1997, six out of ten Americans have a personal experience with adoption, meaning that they, a close friend, a family member placed a child for adoption or adopted a child (Dudley, 2004). As adoption is now embedded in American life, it also raises a lot of issues and concerns that are now matters of public debates. Different viewpoints on the nature of adoption and its effects, whether they are beneficial or disadvantageous are continuously being debated upon. 

Essay on Hate Crimes





Essay on Hate Crimes

            The society is composed of diverse people who interact with each other every day.  People belongs to different  culture, religious affiliation, political affiliation, race, ethnic groups and other group memberships. People are also differentiated though age, sex, gender, socio- economic backgrounds, languages, opinions, etc.  As we roam around the street, observe different commuters in a bus or a train and walk around the neighborhood, we would definitely notice that people are very different in many ways. Diversity in the society is integral since it integrates different ideas and beliefs which can inspire people to learn from different viewpoints and develop accepting attitudes toward differentiation. Despite these advantages, the growing diversity in our population also increases the violence and the crime committed because of the prejudices and discrimination toward members of a particular social group. Crimes committed because of discrimination and prejudices through minorities or a particular social group are called Hate Crimes. 

            Hate crimes have various definitions in literature. Just as much as the concept of crime in general, it is very difficult to construct an exhaustive definition of hate crime. According to the American Psychological Association, hate crime is any felony or crime that manifests based on “race, color, religion, or national origin. Hate crimes can be understood as a crime fueled by the negative attitudes and opinions toward a particular group of persons. It can involve a specific aspect of a victim’s identity like his ethnicity, race, religion and gender. Hate crimes are more than just biases or prejudices because they involve dangerous actions such as physical assault, shooting, cross burnings etc. Wolfe and Copeland (1994) on the other hand defined the phenomenon of hate crime as violence directed towards group people who are seen by the majority society as not valuable, who suffer discrimination in other areas and who do not have full access to political, economic and social justice. Based on this definition given by Wolfe and Copeland, Perry (2001) suggested that hate crimes include violence and intimidation which are directed towards stigmatized and marginalized groups. It is a mechanism of power and oppression that reaffirms the existing hierarchies in a particular social order. 

            Hate crimes have two important elements that are widely accepted: first, it includes actions that are already defined as illegal in the state or federal statutes. Second, it requires that a religious, ethnic racial or some other identified difference between the victim and the perpetrator play a big part in the criminal act (Levin & McDevitt, 2008).  Hate crimes are often caused by confusion, ignorance and fear of the differences. The feeling of superiority of the majority over the minorities are also a reason behind the perpetration of hate crimes. Perpetrators of hate crimes who are members of organized hate groups believe that society should be pure and the majorities should rule that is why they should get rid of the minorities. 

            Hate crimes are reported to be most motivated by the racial bias. Minorities like the American- African, Hispanics, Asians are often the targets of hate crime. Hate crimes also target religious minorities like the Arab and the Muslim Americans. Homosexuals and Transgenders are also being victimized by various hate crime groups. Violent hate crime victimization often causes great risks of psychological distress stress, depression, anger) than the victims of other violent crimes. Victims of hate crimes are also at risk of developing mental health problems that involve anxiety, depression and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 

            In order to stop hate crimes, lawmakers, law enforcement officials, leaders, researchers, educators and policy makers should work together. Federal discrimination laws, regulation and statutes that are full legal protection from biased motivated and discrimination crimes like the The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (H.R. 1913, 111th Congress) and The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act (S. 909, 111th Congress) should be supported. Researches that asses the incidence, prevalences, predictors and outcomes of hate crimes and also the effects of hate crimes on the victims should be encouraged and supported.

References
Levin, J., & McDevitt, J. (2002). Hate crimes revisited: America’s war against those who are
different. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Perry, B. (2001) In the name of hate: Understanding hate crimes. New York: Routledge

Wolfe, L. & Copeland, L. (1994) Violence against women as bias-motivated hate crime:
defining the issues in the USA’, in M. Davies (ed.). Women and Violence. London: Zed
Books


This is a sample Essay on Hate Crimes.  We are the leading provider of affordable essay writing services in the United States and the United Kingdom.  If you need help we will write well written essays at very affordable costs starting at $7.50/page.

Essay on Administrator Challenges in the Field of Criminal Justice




Essay on Administrator Challenges in the Field of Criminal Justice 
           
            The criminal justice system of the United States is an institution that is directed upon acting and enforcing the criminal laws, thus it is a system that ensure social control, mitigate the crime and sanction the violators of the law. One of the important components of the criminal justice system is the Criminal Justice Administration. Criminal Justice administration focuses on the enforcement of policies and procedure, managing administrative decision making and directing the overall day- to- day operations of the system. Aside from setting the work flow policies, enforcing procedures and polices and directing everyday operations, the Criminal Justice Administrator also oversees the budget of the agency and the policies requires in the different programs of the system. He is also in charge of supervising the agency staff including the investigators, secretaries, lawyers, judicial clerks ad enforcing officer. He is also in charge with the reviewing and approving the reports made by the staff and making sure that all the information they submit are accurate and follow the standard procedures (Peak, 2010).  With all these responsibilities at hand, the criminal justice administrators equally face a lot of challenges everyday just to ensure that the whole system is functioning.

            One of the issues that the Criminal Justice Administrators need to address is the challenge of implementing a human service model of employee supervision. One of the vital roles of the criminal justice administrators is to supervise the agency staff. Due to the conflicting goals, competing interests and fiscal /organizational constraints, it is often difficult for the criminal justice administrators supervise all the staff efficiency (Goldstein, 2010). The components of the criminal justice system are composed of various goals and functions that sometimes conflict with each other. It is then the criminal justice administrators challenge to reorganize the components of the criminal justice system in order to reduce the conflicts. Also, as an organization, the criminal justice is composed of diverse people. The organizational diversity especially among the employees is often seen as a contributing factor in the overall conflict within the system. These organizational diversity also forces the administrators to think of and develop innovative ways in evaluating and supervising the employees. 

            Another pressing challenge that the criminal justice administration is continuously facing is that of the large volumes of caseloads. Due to the increasing cases filed every day and with little number of staff to act on them, the caseloads continue to pile up. There are a lot of delayed hearings in the court due to the piling up cases (Stojkovic,Kalinich & Kolfas, 2011). Every day there are more than hundreds of new cases making it difficult for the system especially the court to accommodate all.  It is the justice administrators challenge to enforce more efficient procedures in the operation for quicker responses on filed cases. Also, it is a challenge for the administrators to design a new training for the employees and staff that will gear towards greater efficiency. With more efficient procedures and trained employees, the piling up of caseloads can be lessened significantly. 

            Lastly, just like any other organization and system the law enforcement faces issues regarding the limited budget for their operations. Chief justice administrators administer and manage the budget allocated or the whole system. Making the ends meet or assuring that the budget allocated for the system are used in ways that the programs of the system are still carried out are everyday challenges for the chief justice administrators. Often, they face budget cuts that would then trigger to reduction on staff, programs, etc. With such a tight budget, the administrators need to make sure that everything especially in the operations is still being carried out without compromising the quality of services that they produce.Administrators need to develop budget policies and allocation that can still sustain everyday operations.

Sources:
Goldstein, A. (2010). Selected Problems in the Administration of Criminal Justice. Retrieved September 3, 2013, from http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1068&context=callaw

Peak, K. (2010). Justice Administration: Police, Courts, and Corrections Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Stojkovic, S., Kalinich, D., & Klofas, J. (2011). Criminal Justice Organizations: Administration and Management. United Kingdom: Cengage Learning.



This is a sample Essay on Administrator Challenges in the Field of Criminal Justice.  We are the leading provider of affordable essay writing services in the United States and the United Kingdom.  If you need help we will write well written essays at very affordable costs starting at $7.50/page.

Essay on Preventing Prostate Cancer




Essay on Preventing Prostate Cancer
Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer diagnosed among men. Even through years of study and research, there is still no sure way to prevent prostate cancer (Mayo Clinic, 2011). Even the results of these studies on prostate cancer prevention often conflict with each other. 

Given that the exact causes of prostate cancer is still unknown, doctors still cannot determine how to prevent its occurrence. However, you can make some life choices that might help in reducing your risk. Experts know that diet and lifestyle play a big part in an individual’s risk in developing prostate cancer (Mayo Clinic, 2011). There have been some medications and supplements that show promise in preventing prostate cancer, but additional research and study is needed to evaluate their true effect.

Prostate cancer can happen to any man but is most common in older men, men with a family history of prostate cancer and most especially in African-American men (CDC Wonder , 2013). Although age, race and genetics factors cannot be controlled there are things that an individual male can do that allows him to control risk factors that doctors believe lower down the risk of prostate cancer.

Doctors recommend switching to a healthy diet that is low in fat. Increasing the amount of fruit and vegetable intake each day and eating fish that is rich in Omega-3 is also recommended by doctors. Experts also recommend maintaining a healthy weight as links have been seen between the occurrences of prostate cancer to obesity (Mayo Clinic, 2011). Screening tests like Digital Rectal Exam (DRE) and Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test that check for the occurrence of prostate cancer is also recommended. Still some men have higher risks of prostate cancer compared to others. These aforementioned steps then need to be coupled with doctor’s consultations to determine what steps should be followed for each individual.

All types of men can have prostate cancer but African-American men have a higher predisposition to the said disease.  The average baseline score for this group in 1999 is 69.0 (adjusted per 100,000 standard population) (CDC Wonder, 2011). By the year 2010 the target score set for this group is 28.2. Through looking at the year to year data, we can see that the rate of death of this group has lowered from 69.0 in 1999 to 51.5 by 2007 (CDC Wonder, 2011). This shows that among African-American males, the recommended behaviors prescribed to lower the number of deaths caused by prostate cancer are being practiced by a higher number of people since the start of the objective.

Obesity among African-American males is one of the biggest factors pinpointed that cause the high number of prostate cancer deaths (Mayo Clinic, 2011). The diet that is shared among this group is not considered healthy and is not conducive to lowering the risk of prostate cancer. The prevalent diet within this group is dominated by fatty foods, processed meats and others classified as fast food, none of which can remotely be classified as part of a healthy diet. 

Another big factor among African-American males is the lack of screening for prostate cancer (Odedina et. al., 2011). Even among African-American men who have been educated in the advantages and limitations of prostate cancer screening the number of people within this group is not as large as the number of people who get screened for prostate cancer in other groups. Furthermore, according to a journal titled Modifiable Prostate Cancer Risk Reduction and Early Detection Behaviors in Black Men, African-American men who are most informed about prostate cancer screening seem to have a more fatalistic view of prostate cancer and use that as a reason for not getting screened aside from financial constraints; the most cited reason.

Through the Healthy People Objective on prostate cancer the number of incidents of deaths caused by prostate cancer is slowly going down. The ratio has gone down progressively and with a target improvement rate of 10 percent from 2007 to 2020 the ratio is expected to go down to 21.2 (Healthy People, 2013). Even with the reduction of the number of deaths from prostate cancer this will still be a concern by the year 2020. There has not been a lot of changes to the efforts from the 2010 movement to the 2020 movement though this type of action do take time to gain traction as the general population targeted continues to get informed and the factors that inhibits the ability of the target groups to be able to follow the prescribed behaviors are addressed.









References
Healthy People (2013) 2020 Topics and Objectives. Healthy People 2020. Retrieved from http://healthypeople.gov/2020/default.aspx
CDC Wonder (2011) Data 2010. CDC Wonder. Retrieved from http://wonder.cdc.gov/data2010/obj.htm

Mayo Clinic (2011) Prostate cancer prevention: Ways to reduce your risk. Mayo Clinic Online. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/prostate-cancer-prevention/MC00027


Odedina, Folakemi T., Scrivens, Jr., John J., Larose-Pierre, Margareth, Emanuel, Frank, Adams, Angela Denise, Dagne, Getachew A., Pressey, Shannon Alexi, Odedina, Oladapo. (2011) Modifiable Prostate Cancer Risk Reduction and Early Detection Behaviors in Black Men. American Journal of Health Behavior. Jul/Aug2011, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p470-484. 15p



This is a sample Essay on Preventing Prostate Cancer.  We are the leading provider of affordable essay writing services in the United States and the United Kingdom.  If you need help we will write well written essays at very affordable costs starting at $7.50/page.