Case Summary of Lochner v. New York (198 U.S. 45)
A
law was passed in the State of New York called the Bakeshop Act of 1895 which is
under Section 110 of the labor law of the State of New York seeking to limit
the working hours of bakers to ten a day and 60 a week. Joseph Lochner who owned a small bakery in
Utica was fined $50 for permitting an employee to work more than 60 hours in a
week. Lochner was convicted in the trial
court. On appeal, he challenged the constitutionality of the Bakeshop Act
arguing that the law caused interference in his right to pursue a lawful
trade. On the other hand, the state
argued that the law was a valid exercise of police power as it sought to
protect the health and safety of employees working in bakeries.
The
issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court can invalidate a state law
restricting the hours employees could work in the baking industry as a
violation of the freedom of contract guaranteed by the Due Process Clause of
the Fourth Amendment. Another issue is whether the law is a valid exercise of
the police power of the state.
The
Supreme Court ruled that Section 110 of the labor law of the State of New York
which provides that no employees shall be required or permitted to work in
bakeries for more than sixty hours in a week or ten hours a day is not a
legitimate exercise of the police power of the state but an unreasonable,
unnecessary and arbitrary interference with the right and liberty of the
individual to contract in relation to labor. The court said that “There is no reasonable ground for interfering with the
liberty of person or the right of free contract by determining the hours of
labor in the occupation of a baker.”
Individuals
have a right to enter into contracts in relation to their business. This is a right protected under the
Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution. The said provision provides that no state can
deprive a person of life, liberty and property without due process of law. The
right to purchase or sell labor is a liberty protected under the Fourth
Amendment.
In
previous cases, the court has validly restricted or limited life, liberty and property
under the exercise of police powers. For
instance, the courts have ruled that limiting the number of working hours in
mines have been ruled to be a valid exercise of police power.
However,
the law which is the subject of controversy should have a direct connection to
a danger that would compromise the public health or the health of employees
before it may restrict the hours of labor in any trade or profession. In the case of workers in mines restricting
the hours worked has a direct relation to public health. However, for the
bakers working in bakeries, the connection to the public health or welfare was
considered to be too remote.
The impact
of this decision is that it virtually declared that in a capitalistic economy
minimum government interference in businesses should be the policy and that
business should be allowed to enter into various contracts.
BUY CASE SUMMARY OF LOCHNER V. NEW YORK (198 U.S. 45)
This is a sample case summary of Lochner v. New York (198 U.S. 45). We are the leading provider of affordable essay writing services
in the United States and the United Kingdom. If you need help we will
write well written essays at very affordable costs
starting at $7.50/page.
No comments:
Post a Comment