Essay on Cameron Todd Willingham
This
is a case about Cameron Todd Willingham who was proven guilty of committing
arson in 1992 and died through death penalty in 2004. The Court found him
guilty of setting his family’s Corsicana, Texas home which killed his two young
children. Willingham was able to escape from the fire and his wife was not at
home when the fire broke out. Prosecutors believed that Willingham committed
arson so that his abusive acts on his children will not be revealed.
However,
this was not really proven in Court and his wife testified that Willingham was
not an abusive father. However, an investigative report done by the David Grann
of The New Yorker in 2004 revealed that shows that Willingham was actually
innocent, and so Texas executed an innocent man (Grann, 2004). This
investigative report basically supported the earlier findings of the Innocence
Project wherein some of America’s best forensic experts also agree that the
main evidence that made Willingham guilty of arson was invalid. It was revealed
that the Texas officials did not really pay attention to this evidence that
would have stopped the execution.
The
main evidence that resulted to the conviction of Willingham was the outcome of
the investigation of the police officers after the fire. It was discovered that
the fire was caused by a type of liquid accelerant (Clarke, 2007). This
evidence was supported by char patterns that can be seen on the floor and the
fact that the fire spread quickly all over the house. Even if there was no
obvious motive that was determined, and the wife of Willingham testified that
she did not fight with her husband before the fire happened, it was the
testimony from a fellow prisoner that sealed the doom of Willingham. This
prisoner testified that Willingham mentioned to him that he was the one
responsible for burning their house.
The
evidence of liquid accelerant was controversial because it was never really
proven to be the one that caused the fire. Willingham believed that the fire
started because of electrical problems, and it was never established that
Willingham was the one who sprayed the liquid accelerant all over the house for
it to burn quickly. Aside from this, the acceptance of the testimony of a
fellow prisoner was controversial because this was a confession that was not
really proven to be true (Williams, 2012). It could have been possible that the
prisoner simply made up a story where Willingham admitted his crime, but
nonetheless this testimony was still admitted in Court and helped significantly
towards the conviction of Willingham.
After
the death of Willingham through capital punishment, there had always been
questions regarding how reliable the evidence that was used in order to convict
Willingham. This is because it was never determined that an accelerant was used
to help burn the house. Gerald L. Hurst, and expert in arson cases, analyzed
the case once again and he himself did not think that an accelerant was used to
burn the house. In 2009 the State of Texas decided that it was necessary to
conduct another examination of Willingham’s case. Dr. Craig Beyler was the
person who conducted the re-examination and concluded that arson cannot be
proven to have been really done by Willingham (Pollock, 2011). Many other fire
experts also supported the conclusions of Dr. Craig Beyler and believed that
the prosecutors did not really establish their arguments in solid and reliable
facts. Even the Texas Forensic Science Commission has already admitted that
because Willingham’s guilt in terms of committing arson could not be proven
beyond reasonable doubt, it could be possible that the state of Texas may have
executed an innocent person in 2004.
REFERENCES
Clarke,
A. (2007). The Bitter Fruit of American
Justice. Philadelphia, PA: UPNE
Grann,
D. (2004). “Trial by Fire.” Retrieved January 11, 2013 at http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/09/07/090907fa_fact_grann
Pollock,
J. (2011). Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions
in Criminal Justice. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning
Williams,
K. (2012). Most Deserving Death? New
York, NY: Ashgate Publishing
This is a sample Essay on Cameron Todd Willingham from
smartessaywriters.com – the leading provider of reliable and affordable essay
writing services and research
paper writing services in the United States and the United Kingdom
Related Posts:
1. Argumentative Essay against Capital Punishment
2. Essay on Advantages of Capital Punishment
3. Essay on the Moral Dilemma of Capital Punishment
4. The Execution of Troy Davis and the Virtues of Due Process and Clemency
5. Essay on Arguments against Capital Punishment
6. Essay on Arguments in Favor of Capital Punishment
7. Essay on Punishment as a Method of Regulating Behavior
8. Research Paper on Lethal Injection
Related Posts:
1. Argumentative Essay against Capital Punishment
2. Essay on Advantages of Capital Punishment
3. Essay on the Moral Dilemma of Capital Punishment
4. The Execution of Troy Davis and the Virtues of Due Process and Clemency
5. Essay on Arguments against Capital Punishment
6. Essay on Arguments in Favor of Capital Punishment
7. Essay on Punishment as a Method of Regulating Behavior
8. Research Paper on Lethal Injection
No comments:
Post a Comment